Discussion:
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
(too old to reply)
Lynn McGuire
2025-01-08 21:58:06 UTC
Permalink
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
savings including 401K, IRAs, and the cash in our mattresses. Hopefully
not my gold crowns on my back teeth.

Lynn
Scott Lurndal
2025-01-08 22:11:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lynn McGuire
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08
I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.
Paul S Person
2025-01-10 17:09:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Lynn McGuire
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08
I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.
I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.
Post by Scott Lurndal
One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.
The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.

The National Debt is their primary weapon.

They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.

Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
does either.

The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
find something else to spend it on.

Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
the Dems are by no means exempt.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
Dimensional Traveler
2025-01-11 02:05:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul S Person
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Lynn McGuire
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08
I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.
I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.
Post by Scott Lurndal
One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.
The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.
The National Debt is their primary weapon.
They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.
Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
does either.
The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
find something else to spend it on.
Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
the Dems are by no means exempt.
Historically the Dems have reduced the national debt and balanced the
budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
to do either.
--
I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
dirty old man.
Paul S Person
2025-01-11 17:00:57 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:05:59 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
Post by Dimensional Traveler
Post by Paul S Person
Post by Scott Lurndal
Post by Lynn McGuire
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08
I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.
I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.
Post by Scott Lurndal
One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.
The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.
The National Debt is their primary weapon.
They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.
Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
does either.
The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
find something else to spend it on.
Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
the Dems are by no means exempt.
Historically the Dems have reduced the national debt and balanced the
budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
to do either.
To be sure, but that was in the past.

Clinton, our last fiscally-responisble President, left office with a
/surplus/. His Republican successor found nothing better to do with it
but reduce taxes on rich people. At least /that/ tax cut was funded.
Unlike the one in 2017.

And, let's face it, "reduce the Debt" just isn't as /sexy/ politically
as "let's spend the money on [just about anything else]".
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
D
2025-01-11 23:41:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Paul S Person
Post by Dimensional Traveler
budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
to do either.
To be sure, but that was in the past.
Clinton, our last fiscally-responisble President, left office with a
/surplus/. His Republican successor found nothing better to do with it
but reduce taxes on rich people. At least /that/ tax cut was funded.
Unlike the one in 2017.
Reducing taxes is very erotic, and another way to say that is to give people
their freedom back.

Anyone who raises taxes is a homo, and that is a very bad thing.
Post by Paul S Person
And, let's face it, "reduce the Debt" just isn't as /sexy/ politically
as "let's spend the money on [just about anything else]".
Paul S Person
2025-01-10 17:04:59 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:58:06 -0600, Lynn McGuire
Post by Lynn McGuire
Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08
I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our
savings including 401K, IRAs, and the cash in our mattresses. Hopefully
not my gold crowns on my back teeth.
All of /ours/, maybe, but certainly not any of the 1%-ers assets.

Which go far beyond bank accounts, IRAs, 401s of any description, cash
in mattresses. And might actually be enough to work.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
Loading...